Although I agree with Arnie, he's not actually arguing correctly. The way I get it, the OP is working from the premise that:
Olympics is meant for those with the best physical abilities
Added to that, the concept that those in the Special Olympics aren't the people with best physicial abilities,
leading to the conclusion that "retards" shouldnt be in a tournament referred to as "Olympics".
The response of Arnie is not an argument against his logic (which, by the rules of logic is actually correct), but an ad hominem (basically, saying "You're wrong,because you're a dick".
Again... I agree, OP is a dick.
But the main thing here is the assumption that "Olympic" means "Fittest" by default. As if there's only one Olympics possible. There's no law against Olympic anything. There could be Special Olympics (there are, yay), there could be "Cold Olympics" (Summer Olympics, done in the snow), there could be Reverse Olympics (running backwards) and so on :)
So even without an ad hominem, you could retort that retard (no, not the participant in the Special Olympics, but OP)
More Pictures » 
Although I agree with Arnie, he's not actually arguing correctly. The way I get it, the OP is working from the premise that:
Olympics is meant for those with the best physical abilities
Added to that, the concept that those in the Special Olympics aren't the people with best physicial abilities,
leading to the conclusion that "retards" shouldnt be in a tournament referred to as "Olympics".
The response of Arnie is not an argument against his logic (which, by the rules of logic is actually correct), but an ad hominem (basically, saying "You're wrong,because you're a dick".
Again... I agree, OP is a dick.
But the main thing here is the assumption that "Olympic" means "Fittest" by default. As if there's only one Olympics possible. There's no law against Olympic anything. There could be Special Olympics (there are, yay), there could be "Cold Olympics" (Summer Olympics, done in the snow), there could be Reverse Olympics (running backwards) and so on :)
So even without an ad hominem, you could retort that retard (no, not the participant in the Special Olympics, but OP)