Thanks for your even more creative interpretation. The "model" is my daughter, BTW. She was playing the piano in a black dress and I saw the "creative" opportunity.
Thanks for the comment. I really didn't notice the "anomaly" until now. Every time I looked at the image, my eyes were always focused on the water because it is the only "sharp" thing there.
The problem will be one of judging apples with oranges. A post-processed Bokeh will always be of a higher quality than one resulting from a Bokeh technique.
If it is mentioned that it is a post-processed Bokeh, do we then put a lower voting weightage to it as compared to a "natural" Bokeh? If not what then is the point of mentioning that it is Post-processed since both natural and post-processed ones are judged together?
I am not insisting of course and please don't take my comments the wrong way, but I see judging problems giving rise to an unfair imbalance of votes.
I hope I don't come across as being aggressive as sometimes words alone may appear so.
